StudySmarter - The all-in-one study app.
4.8 • +11k Ratings
More than 3 Million Downloads
Lerne mit deinen Freunden und bleibe auf dem richtigen Kurs mit deinen persönlichen LernstatistikenJetzt kostenlos anmelden
Nie wieder prokastinieren mit unseren Lernerinnerungen.Jetzt kostenlos anmelden
What does an octopus have in common with bananas? In the first half of the 20th century, Central American countries nicknamed America's United Fruit Company El Pupo, the octopus. Its tentacles controlled much of their economies and even politics. Indeed, El Pupo turned some Latin American countries into "banana republics"—a derogatory term used to describe economies reliant on the export of a single commodity. The United Fruit Company example demonstrates the powerful way in which economic imperialism works.
Fig. 1 - A propaganda image for the Belgian Congo, “Go ahead, do what they do!” by the Belgian Ministry of Colonies, 1920s. Source: Wikipedia Commons (public domain).
Economic imperialism may take different forms.
Economic imperialism is using economic means to influence or control a foreign country or territory.
Prior to 20th-century decolonization, European colonial empires directly conquered and controlled foreign territories. They settled, established colonial rule over the native population, extracted their resources, and oversaw trade and trade routes. In many cases, colonial settlers also brought their culture, religion, and language because they believed in "civilizing" the locals.
Decolonization is a process by which a country gains independence in a political, economic, social, and cultural sense from a foreign empire.
After World War II, many former colonies worldwide gained independence through decolonization. As a result, some more powerful states began to exert indirect control over these weaker states. Here, economic imperialism was part of neocolonialism.
Neocolonialism is an indirect form of colonialism that uses economic, cultural, and other means to exert control over a foreign country.
Economic imperialism in Africa was part of both old colonialism and neocolonialism.
Many cultures used imperialism and colonialism throughout documented history. However, from around the year 1500, it was the European powers that became the most prominent colonial empires:
Direct European colonialism led to many negative consequences:
Countries that colonized Africa in the 19th and early 20th centuries were:
Fig. 2 - Wells Missionary Map Co. Africa. [?, 1908] Map. https://www.loc.gov/item/87692282/.
Between the 16th century and the abolition of slavery in the 19th century in different European countries, African slaves were treated in an inhumane manner and used:
Between 1908–1960, Belgium controlled the African country of Congo. The colony of Belgian Congo is known for some of the worst and most brutal crimes, such as murder, maiming, and starvation, committed by the Europeans in the entire history of European imperialism in Africa. Congo is rich in resources, including:
Belgium exploited some of these resources to its benefit. In 1960, the Democratic Republic of Congo gained independence through postwar decolonization. Congo's leader, Patrice Lumumba, was assassinated in 1961 with the involvement of multiple foreign governments, including Belgium and the U.S. He was murdered for two key reasons:
In the past, the United States possessed several colonies under its direct control that it captured in the Spanish-American War (1898).
The Spanish-American War was, therefore, a key turning point for American imperialism.
However, the U.S. also indirectly controlled other, weaker regional countries without the need to conquer their territories.
Two key doctrines have defined American foreign policy in the western hemisphere:
|The Monroe Doctrine||The Monroe Doctrine (1823) viewed the Western hemisphere as an American sphere of influence to prevent European powers from additional colonization or re-colonizing their former colonies.|
|The Roosevelt Corollary||The Roosevelt Corollary to the Monroe Doctrine (1904) not only considered Latin America an exclusive sphere of influence of the United States but also allowed the United States to intervene in the domestic affairs of regional countries economically and militarily.|
As a result, the United States primarily relied on neocolonial means in the region, such as using economic imperialism. There were exceptions to American economic domination that involved direct military intervention, such as the case of Nicaragua (1912 to 1933).
Fig. 3 - Theodore Roosevelt and the Monroe Doctrine, by Louis Dalrymple, 1904. Source: Judge Company Publishers, Wikipedia Commons (public domain).
The United Fruit Company is the most prominent example of American economic imperialism that dominated its industry in the western hemisphere in the first half of the twentieth century.
The company was essentially a monopoly in Latin America. It controlled:
The United Fruit Company also engaged in illegal activities:
Fig. 4 - United Fruit Company advertising, Montreal Medical Journal, January 1906. Source: Wikipedia Commons (public domain).
The Cochabamba Water War lasted from 1999-2000 in Cochabamba, Bolivia. The name refers to a series of protests that occurred because of the attempted privatization of the water supply through the SEMAPA agency in that city. The deal was backed by the firm Aguas del Tunari and an American giant, Bechtel (a major foreign investor in the area). Water access is a basic necessity and a human right, yet its prices have grown substantially at that time. The protests were a success, and the decision to privatize was canceled.
Two large international institutions were involved in this case:
|International Monetary Fund (IMF)||The IMF offered Bolivia a $138 million package in 1998 in exchange for austerity (government spending cuts) and privatization of vital resources like its oil refineries and the water supply.|
|World Bank||As water prices grew in Bolivia because of privatization, the World Bank argued against offering the country subsidies.|
There are many examples when economic imperialism results in direct meddling in the politics of a foreign country. One well-known case is the 1953 regime change in Iran.
In 1953, the U.S. and British intelligence services carried out a successful regime change in Iran by overthrowing Prime Minister Mohammad Mosaddegh. He was a democratically elected leader. The regime change gave Shah Mohammad Reza Pahlavi more power.
The Anglo-Americans overthrew Prime Minister Mohammad Mosaddegh for the following reasons:
Before overthrowing Iran's Prime Minister, Britain used other means:
This behavior demonstrates that as soon as a country attempted to take control of its natural resources and use them for its own people's benefit, foreign intelligence agencies mobilized to overthrow that country's government.
In some cases, international bodies are part of economic imperialism.
The experience of Bolivia means that greater examination of international financial bodies is required. The International Monetary Fund, IMF, and the World Bank are often impartial. Their backers claim that these organizations offer economic mechanisms, such as loans, to countries experiencing financial troubles. The critics, however, charge the IMF and the World Bank with being the tool of powerful, neocolonial interests that keep the Global South in debt and dependent.
To meet the loan conditions, international financial institutions often require a policy of economic austerity by cutting government spending in key areas, which harms the ordinary people. The critics of IMF policies argue that such measures lead to increased poverty. For example, the scholars at Boston University analyzed 79 qualifying countries between 2002 and 2018:
Their findings show that stricter austerity is associated with greater income inequality for up to two years and that this effect is driven by concentrating income to the top ten percent of earners, while all other deciles lose out. The authors also found that stricter austerity is associated with higher poverty headcounts and poverty gaps. Taken together, their findings suggest the IMF has neglected the multiple ways its policy advice contributes to social inequity in the developing world." 1
There are many effects of imperialism. Supporters, who refrain from using the term "imperialism," list the following positives, in their view:
The critics disagree and argue that economic imperialism results in the following:
Economic imperialism may take on different forms. It can be part of old colonialism in which colonial empires occupied foreign territories, controlled the native populations, and extracted their resources. Economic imperialism can also be part of neo-colonialism which exerts economic pressure on foreign countries in less direct ways. For example, a large foreign corporation may own commodity-producing assets in a foreign country without direct political control.
On the eve of World War I, European empires and the Ottoman Empire controlled much of the world. They also competed for access to raw materials, trade routes, and markets. The imperial competition was one of the causes of this war. The war contributed to the dissolution of three empires: Austro-Hungarian, Russian, and Ottoman empires.
Imperialism featured a mix of causes: economic, political, social, and cultural. The economic aspect of imperialism focused on obtaining resources and controlling trade routes and markets.
Africa is a resource-rich continent, so it appealed to European colonialism as a resource extraction and trade source. Imperialism affected Africa in many ways, such as redrawing the African borders that set many present-day countries on a path to tribal, ethnic, and religious conflict. European imperialism also imposed its own languages on the people of Africa. Earlier forms of European colonialism used Africa as a source of slaves in the Trans-Atlantic slave trade.
There are several economic causes of imperialism, including 1) access to resources; 2) control of markets; 3) control of trade routes; 4) control of specific industries.
What is economic imperialism?
Economic imperialism is the process of using economic means to influence or control a foreign country or territory.
What political process sped up in Asia, Africa, and Latin America after World War II?
What form of control was primarily used by powerful states since the mid-20th century?
In which country did the Cochabamba Water War take place?
What present-day international bodies provide loans and other help to the Global South?
The IMF and the World Bank
What American company was called "the octopus" in Latin America?
United Fruit Company
When did the U.S. and Britain carry out regime change in Iran?
Congo was a former country of which European power?
The U.S. foreign policy in Latin America was historically guided by:
Roosevelt Corollary to the Monroe Doctrine
The U.S. had formal colonies after which war?
of the users don't pass the Economic Imperialism quiz! Will you pass the quiz?Start Quiz
Be perfectly prepared on time with an individual plan.
Test your knowledge with gamified quizzes.
Create and find flashcards in record time.
Create beautiful notes faster than ever before.
Have all your study materials in one place.
Upload unlimited documents and save them online.
Identify your study strength and weaknesses.
Set individual study goals and earn points reaching them.
Stop procrastinating with our study reminders.
Earn points, unlock badges and level up while studying.
Create flashcards in notes completely automatically.
Create the most beautiful study materials using our templates.
Sign up to highlight and take notes. It’s 100% free.
Over 10 million students from across the world are already learning smarter.Get Started for Free