Select your language

Suggested languages for you:
Log In Start studying!
StudySmarter - The all-in-one study app.
4.8 • +11k Ratings
More than 3 Million Downloads
Free
|
|

All-in-one learning app

  • Flashcards
  • NotesNotes
  • ExplanationsExplanations
  • Study Planner
  • Textbook solutions
Start studying

BBC Prison Study

Save Save
Print Print
Edit Edit
Sign up to use all features for free. Sign up now
BBC Prison Study

The BBC Prison Study (2002) was a documentary series of an experiment designed by Steve Reicher and Alex Haslam. The study, originally labelled as ‘the Experiment’, sought to explore the consequences of imposing an unequal system of power on a group of people. There was concern about the study being a replication of the infamous Stanford prison experiment (1971), which, despite its insightful findings, was heavily criticised for being unethical. However, Reicher and Haslam assured that this study would be conducted more ethically.

The researchers wanted to find out more about how and why humans commit atrocities. In particular, they were keen to understand how power plays a role in crimes against humanity, such as genocide.

Before the BBC prison study, several notable experiments had been carried out in social psychology to help us understand what makes people commit ‘evil’ acts. Such experiments include:

  • Sherif’s Robbers Cave experiment (1954).

  • Milgram’s experiment on obedience (1961).

  • Zimbardo’s Stanford prison experiment (1971).

The BBC prison study went on to deepen our understanding of group psychology, systems of power, tyranny and inequality and is considered to be a key study in the field of social psychology.

The BBC prison study [...] examines when people accept inequality and when they challenge it. - bbcprisonstudy.org

What was the aim of the BBC prison study?

Based on the understanding of human behaviour obtained from previous studies, researchers Reicher and Haslam sought to study the following questions:

‘When do people go along with oppressive groups? When do people act as a group to challenge oppression?

To bring these questions to life, the researchers aimed to observe oppressive behaviour in a simulated prison setting. They aimed to look at not only the tyranny but also resistance.

BBC Prison Study participants StudySmarterThe participants of the 2002 study. thepsychologist.bps.org.uk

BBC prison study summary: procedure and methodology

After screening over 300 applicants that had applied to be participants, the researchers chose 15 men. These men were described as ‘decent’, namely that they did not have violent or vulnerable backgrounds.

Out of the 15 men, five were randomly selected as guards whilst the rest became prisoners. The researchers took care to ensure that both groups were psychologically similar so that any differences in group behaviour could be attributed to their group itself and not their personalities. Prisoners were told that guards were selected because they had certain characteristics, such as trustworthiness, even though this was not true.

The prison setting

The whole study was conducted in a setup resembling a prison with no windows. The prison consisted of a central common area for the prisoners with a separate room for guards to observe prisoners from. This study took the form of an experimental case study.

Prisoners had basic amenities in their cells and were given controlled access to a communal shower. Guards could put prisoners in solitary confinement cells if necessary.

Guards had their own quarters with better amenities and higher quality furniture. They also had access to an upper level from which they could look down on the Prisoners’ area. At the start of the study, the guards were informed that they had the power to make up the prison rules as they saw fit. The rules included the power to punish, withdraw privileges and put prisoners in isolation. However, they were told that they were not allowed to use physical violence.

The Guards also had keys and access to all prison areas. They wore uniforms and enjoyed better living conditions.

Collection of data

The researchers used a range of different data collection methods (triangulation) to track participants’ behaviours and motivations.

The researchers used a range of different data collection methods - called triangulation - to track participants’ behaviours and motivations.

  1. All participants were constantly monitored through cameras and microphones.

  2. Participants filled out daily questionnaires about their activities, perceptions and wellbeing.

  3. Researchers collected saliva swabs daily to measure stress levels.

The independent variables

Researchers planned three interventions during the study as a way to impact group dynamics. Researchers did this by manipulating the following independent variables:

Permeability

On the first day, an announcement was made telling prisoners that one prisoner with ‘guard-like’ qualities had the chance to be promoted to a guard. The idea was to make the participants believe the roles were permeable.

On day three, one prisoner was promoted to guard, and the rest of the prisoners were told there would be no more promotions. This created an impermeability of the roles as there would be no more systemic changes.

Legitimacy

Prisoners were then told there were no real differences between them and the guards, but reassigning roles would be impractical. The idea was to question the legitimacy of the roles.

Cognitive alternatives

On day five, a new prisoner with the background as a Trade Unionist was added to the study. He used his skills to organise and negotiate collective action amongst the prisoners. However, he was withdrawn from the study the next day to prevent him from influencing the prisoners further.

BBC prison study, guards and prisoners, StudySmarterThe guards and the prisoners. bbcprisonstudy.org

Findings and applications of the BBC prison study

The study ended early on the eighth day due to ethical reasons; since the design of the study had collapsed, researchers did not feel as if they were able to establish a new study design and hierarchy without the risk of distress, or even violence. Despite this, researchers noted the following findings.

Findings of the BBC prison study

Here are the findings of the BBC prison study after the first, second, and third planned intervention.

After the first planned intervention:

  • Once told that there could be a promotion from prisoner to guard, the prisoners did not work as a group. Instead, they worked individually, as they became interested in obtaining the promotion.

  • There was little to no group identification amongst the prisoners. There was no resistance to the system.

After the second planned intervention:

  • Once the promotion happened and the prisoners were told there are no differences between prisoners and guards, the prisoners began to identify as a group. They worked and socialised together, in order to implement change within their living conditions.

  • The same was not said for the guards, who did not show signs of solidarity and group identification. Their lack of group identity also caused high levels of stress and burnout as demonstrated by the daily saliva swabs.

  • The prisoners saw this and showed low regard for the guards’ authority. They began showing resistance to the system.

After the third planned intervention:

  • Once the Trade Unionists joined, the prisoners began challenging the guards and their powers.

  • One prisoner found a set of a guard’s keys and negotiated together with them for better prison conditions in exchange for the keys.

  • Prisoners collectively broke into the guard quarters and created their own ‘commune’ with their own set of rules. Many of the guards accepted this new system, hence the original design of the experimental case study had collapsed.

Applications of the BBC prison study

The study provided valuable insight into several different aspects of human behaviour. These are outlined below.

Roles and identities

  • The study showed that group identification relied on an internalisation of the group role; namely, there is a difference between being told ‘you are a guard’ and between you thinking ‘I am a guard’.

  • It showed that simply being part of a group is not enough for internalising a role but that individuals must see the role as part of their identity. This is called social identification.

  • The prisoners were much more accepting of their roles when they were told that the roles were legitimate and permeable. When they were told the roles would not change and were not based on real differences, they began to question their roles and the system.

Group organisation and power

  • Shared identities can create consensual norms within groups. The prisoners’ group identification allowed them to negotiate and create their own structure. This suggests shared social identities are a good basis for organisation and holding group power.

  • On the other hand, the guards’ lack of group identification and solidarity led to the prisoners undermining their authority and leadership.

Tyranny and resistance

  • The study showed that tyranny can occur when groups fail to work together. If a group cannot collectively acknowledge its values and beliefs, it is more likely to accept alternatives, even if they are extreme. This could explain why the guards showed little resistance against the new ‘commune’.

Evaluation of the BBC prison study

The study, despite its useful applications to group behaviour, was criticised for several reasons. These are outlined below.

Positives

  • The participants went through extensive screening before the study and were monitored closely during the entire study.

  • There were ethical safeguards throughout the whole study, such as parademics, a 5-person ethical board and the option to withdraw from the study at any time

  • The study attempted to prevent long-term damage to the participants.

  • The study had useful applications regarding group behaviour, systems of power, authority and inequality.

  • The study is reliable as the procedure can be replicated.

  • The use of triangulation in data collection helps increase the validity of the findings.

Negatives

  • There were still ethical concerns once the original design of the case study had collapsed.

  • The study has low ecological validity; the simulated prison setting was artificial and so any behaviour in the study may not happen in real life.

  • The behaviour could have arisen out of demand characteristics as the participants knew this was a study for research purposes.

  • The findings cannot be generalised to the wider population as it was androcentric; the participants were all male. The participants were all volunteers and so this is not representative of the population.


BBC Prison Study - Key takeaways

  • The BBC prison study aimed to look at our understanding of human behaviour in groups with unequal systems of power. It is a key study within social psychology.
  • 15 men were split into prisoners and guards in a simulated prison setting. Their roles and rules were explained to them. Researchers collected data from multiple sources, called triangulation.
  • When told there were no differences between the prisoners and guards, the prisoners formed a stronger group identification and began to work together to implement changes in living conditions. The guards could not do the same and could not decide on how to make decisions. Eventually, the prisoners overthrew the guards and created a new system.
  • The study showed that group identification can create consensual norms that can help achieve goals. This can show how groups can effectively organise themselves and hold power.
  • Tyranny can occur if groups fail to work together. If a group fails, it is more likely to accept alternative power structures.

Frequently Asked Questions about BBC Prison Study

The BBC prison study lasted for 8 days. It ended early due to ethical concerns.

Yes, the BBC prison study contained 15 all-male participants.

In the BBC prison study, the prisoners overthrow the guards' system and created their own set of rules. Many guards accepted this new system.

The BBC prison study was an experimental case study. It sought to study when people go along with oppressive groups and when they act as a group to challenge oppression.

Final BBC Prison Study Quiz

Question

What was the aim of the BBC prison study?

Show answer

Answer

The researchers aimed to observe oppressive behavior in a simulated prison setting.

Show question

Question

How were the participants recruited?


Show answer

Answer

They were recruited through a call for volunteers for the study.

Show question

Question

What kind of study was the BBC prison study?


Show answer

Answer

Experimental case study

Show question

Question

What was explicitly prohibited for the Guards?


Show answer

Answer

Physical violence was explicitly prohibited for the Guards.

Show question

Question

Did anything happen amongst the prisoners when they were told there would be no more promotions and that there were no differences between them and the guards?


Show answer

Answer

Yes; the Prisoners formed a strong group identification and began working together to implement changes in living conditions.

Show question

Question

According to the researchers, why were the prisoners able to break into the guard's quarters and create their own 'commune'?


Show answer

Answer

The guards had no group identification and solidarity, which is why they could not achieve goals and maintain their authority.


Show question

Question

On application of the study what did the researchers state as a reason for tyranny to take place?


Show answer

Answer

The guards could not work together, which is why tyranny took place.

Show question

Question

Which theory did the independent variables in the study come from?


Show answer

Answer

The independent variables came from Tajfel's Social Identity Theory (1978).

Show question

Question

What were the applications of the study?


Show answer

Answer

The study had useful applications regarding group behavior, systems of power, authority and inequality.

Show question

Question

Why can the findings of the study not be generalised?


Show answer

Answer

The findings cannot be generalized to the wider population as it was androcentric; the participants were all male. The participants were all volunteers and so this is not representative of the population.

Show question

60%

of the users don't pass the BBC Prison Study quiz! Will you pass the quiz?

Start Quiz

Discover the right content for your subjects

No need to cheat if you have everything you need to succeed! Packed into one app!

Study Plan

Be perfectly prepared on time with an individual plan.

Quizzes

Test your knowledge with gamified quizzes.

Flashcards

Create and find flashcards in record time.

Notes

Create beautiful notes faster than ever before.

Study Sets

Have all your study materials in one place.

Documents

Upload unlimited documents and save them online.

Study Analytics

Identify your study strength and weaknesses.

Weekly Goals

Set individual study goals and earn points reaching them.

Smart Reminders

Stop procrastinating with our study reminders.

Rewards

Earn points, unlock badges and level up while studying.

Magic Marker

Create flashcards in notes completely automatically.

Smart Formatting

Create the most beautiful study materials using our templates.

Just Signed up?

Yes
No, I'll do it now

Sign up to highlight and take notes. It’s 100% free.