StudySmarter - The all-in-one study app.
4.8 • +11k Ratings
More than 3 Million Downloads
Free
Psychologists are interested in investigating why we form romantic relationships and why they last, as they are an intrinsic part of human life for many of the population. The theories studied here take an economic approach, stating that relationships exchange costs and benefits. Some argue that these exchanges should be unequal, whereas others think they should be equitable.
Psychologists have also studied relationship breakdown. Duck (2007) states that relationships break down in stages ranging from the thought of breaking up to the grave dressing, wherein partners make themselves look good in preparation for their next relationship.
Before we delve into that, let us define a romantic relationship.
According to psychologists, a romantic relationship is when two people form an intimate connection based on attachment, interdependence and a sense of their needs being met.
Types of romantic relationships include casual relationships, dating, marriage, and family.
According to psychologists, romantic relationships develop in several ways: physical attraction, proximity, the similarity of attitudes, and complementarity, among other things.
Multiple theories of romantic relationships exist, and we shall cover them below.
Thibaut and Kelley (1959) describe relationships in economic terms. They claim that partners strive to maximise rewards (praise, comfort, etc.) and minimise costs (arguments, compromises, stress, etc.). According to Thibaut and Kelley, partners use comparison levels to assess how profitable their relationships are. They also use them to move through the stages of sampling (evaluating the potential costs and benefits of a relationship), bargaining (negotiating costs and benefits), and commitment (when a relationship is stable, rewards increase, and costs decrease).
Comparison level is where partners in a relationship compare the cost and rewards of the current relationship to their previous one. If the current one is better, they will be more motivated to maintain the current relationship.
Alternative comparison level compares the current relationship to future, possible relationships. Naturally, this affects whether or not a person decides to stay in a relationship. If they can find a better relationship, they may leave the current one.
For your exam, it is essential to understand the strengths and weaknesses of this theory.
Strengths:
Supported by research – Sprecher (2001) found that the comparison level of alternatives is a significant factor in relationship commitment.
The theory is applicable in real life, e.g., couples therapy.
Weaknesses:
Social exchange theory lacks mundane realism (does not reflect real-world situations).
Subjective (everyone has a different experience of relationships).
Nomothetic approach – tries to set a precedent applicable to everyone.
Deterministic and reductionist – theory states that relationships are based exclusively on costs and benefits when in reality, many factors influence them.
Social exchange theory views relationships as a conflict between partners to reap the rewards.
Proposed by Walster et al. (1978), equity theory states that partners are concerned with fairness in relationships, concerning the input and output each partner provides and receives off one another. When one partner reaps more rewards from a relationship, they feel guilty, whilst the other partner is dissatisfied, and this is known as inequity and distress.
According to equity theory, partners must strive for equal costs and rewards to maintain a happy, fair relationship.
Strengths:
Supported by research, e.g., Stafford and Canary (2006). They found that partners who view their relationships as equal are the most satisfied.
Advocates gender equity as it assumes that equitable relationships are the healthiest.
Weaknesses:
Berg and McQuinn (1986) argued against the equity theory. They conducted a study on married couples and found that dissatisfaction in inequitable relationships was assessed at the beginning of a relationship and predicted if the relationship would last. In contrast, equity theory states that dissatisfaction goes hand in hand with inequity and develops over time, contrary to the results of this study.
Cause and effect suggest that inequity is the cause of unhappiness in relationships, neglecting other factors that might influence it.
Gender differences – Sprecher (1992) points out that women feel more guilty when over-benefitting and more unhappy when under-benefitting, implying that equity theory is more applicable to women.
Cultural differences – Aumer-Ryan et al. (2006) revealed that equity plays a greater role in Western cultures.
Rusbult et al. (2001) aimed to improve the social exchange theory, as they found that many couples stay together even though the costs outweigh the benefits.
The investment model has multiple strengths and weaknesses, which you must know for your exam.
Strengths:
Supported by numerous studies: Impett, Beals, and Peplau (2002), Le and Agnew (2003),
Rhahgan and Axsom (2006), and Bui, Peplau, & Hill (1996).
We can apply it to abusive relationships. For example, if you are more invested in a relationship, you are more likely to stay, even in abusive situations.
Weaknesses:
The majority of research support is correlational.
Research on equity theory is subjective and unreliable, resulting from questionnaires and interviews.
Duck (2007) stated that although breakups seem like a one-time event, they are a progressive breakdown in stages. The romantic relationship stages of breakdown are:
Again, it is important to know the strengths and weaknesses of this theory for your exam.
Strengths:
Supported by scholarly research, such as Tashiro and Frasier (2003).
We can apply it to everyday life, e.g., couples counselling.
Weaknesses:
Most research that supports Duck’s theory is unreliable because it relies on retrospective data (participants look back at their relationships).
Ethical issues exist, such as invasion of privacy.
Individual differences exist, as relationships can fail for a variety of reasons.
Cultural bias – a model based on individualistic cultures, where a breakup is a personal choice and therefore cannot be applied to some collectivist cultures, in which relationships are arranged for the benefit of the group.
It doesn’t state why relationships fail, only that they do.
There are many theories about why we form romantic relationships, namely: the social exchange theory (Thibaut and Kelley), equity theory (Walster et al.), the investment model (Rusbult), and Duck’s phase model.
Some psychologists believe that our attraction is an innate, evolutionary force, whereas others view it as a social phenomenon, stating that factors such as similarity of values influence our attraction.
The reasons why we stay in a relationship are also debatable. Some think that partners try to take advantage of a relationship, whereas others consider they should strive for equity.
Duck proposed that relationships break down over time in a series of stages.
The advantages of relationships theories are that they are instrumental and have much research to support them.
The disadvantages of theories of relationships are that they are often subjective and come from anecdotal, retrospective evidence.
According to psychologists, a romantic relationship is when two people form an intimate connection based on attachment, interdependence and a sense of their needs being met.
It means to have an intimate connection and relationship with another person.
Casual, dating, marriage, family.
According to psychologists, romantic relationships develop in several ways: physical attraction, proximity, the similarity of attitudes, and complementarity, among other things.
Two people form an intimate connection.
Be perfectly prepared on time with an individual plan.
Test your knowledge with gamified quizzes.
Create and find flashcards in record time.
Create beautiful notes faster than ever before.
Have all your study materials in one place.
Upload unlimited documents and save them online.
Identify your study strength and weaknesses.
Set individual study goals and earn points reaching them.
Stop procrastinating with our study reminders.
Earn points, unlock badges and level up while studying.
Create flashcards in notes completely automatically.
Create the most beautiful study materials using our templates.
Sign up to highlight and take notes. It’s 100% free.