StudySmarter - The all-in-one study app.
4.8 • +11k Ratings
More than 3 Million Downloads
Free
Americas
Europe
Understanding the causation of something is not an easy task for psychology researchers. It takes time, and there are specific protocols in place that must be followed to achieve this. A researcher can't simply state that an unhealthy diet can lead to memory issues; this is a serious claim that can have serious implications. Thus, the claim must be tested…
Explore our app and discover over 50 million learning materials for free.
Lerne mit deinen Freunden und bleibe auf dem richtigen Kurs mit deinen persönlichen Lernstatistiken
Jetzt kostenlos anmeldenUnderstanding the causation of something is not an easy task for psychology researchers. It takes time, and there are specific protocols in place that must be followed to achieve this. A researcher can't simply state that an unhealthy diet can lead to memory issues; this is a serious claim that can have serious implications. Thus, the claim must be tested using a rigorous scientific method.
Fig. 1 - In psychology, researchers try to put the pieces of human behaviour together via testing causation relationships between variables.
When trying to establish a new area of knowledge in psychology, showing that the aspects of research are causally linked is the epitome of sound research.
Psychologists apply the scientific method to carry out their research. The findings from the research can be considered empirical if carried out properly. For research to be accepted by the psychology community, the investigated variables should be observable (empirical research), and the research and its results should be reliable and valid.
Causation in psychology refers to understanding a phenomenon in terms of cause and effect and relating the two conclusively in a controlled scientific manner.
Causation research should state:
Experimental research is a form of causation research. It takes place in a controlled setting and attempts to understand the causation relationship between two variables.
In the research, the independent variable is manipulated (hypothesised as the cause of the phenomenon). And the effect this has on the dependent variable is measured.
During the causation experiment, extraneous variables, i.e. external factors that are not the independent variable that may influence the dependent variable, must be controlled.
If not, this lowers the research's validity, and consequently, the findings are not accepted.
When carrying out research that tests causal relationships, there are four rules researchers have to consider.
The first rule of causation is testing an association to establish a causation relationship between two variables, and these must be empirically tested. The findings from testing the association must have either an association or show some significant pattern or trend when empirically tested.
A researcher should find a significant pattern that indicates that as one variable increases, the other must also increase or decrease.
The temporal order between the cause and effect must be sequential; this means that the researcher needs to observe the cause first and then see the effect.
The sequential order allows the researcher to identify that the effect occurred due to the cause.
Imagine researching how sleep deprivation affects exam results. For a causal relationship to be established, the researcher needs to observe that exam results changed before and after being sleep-deprived. It must also rule out that other external influences (extraneous variables) have been ruled out (e.g. lack of food and poor diet affecting concentration levels, for instance).
The third rule of causation is nonspuriousness. Nonspuriousness means that causal relationships should not result from external variables (confounding/ extraneous variables).
If this is the case, it can be assumed that the external variables may explain the effect observed in the independent variable better than the dependent variable.
The research found that sleep deprivation affected students' exam results. However, when the study was replicated the following morning, the causal relationship was no longer found.
The findings suggest that the time that students took the exam may be the cause rather than sleep deprivation.
And the final rule of causation is chance. Researchers must ensure that the results found did not occur due to chance. If the results did not occur because of chance, similar results would be found when the study is replicated. Thus, the research has high validity and reliability. Chance is a statistical percentage that is measured via statistical tests.
Chance in psychology research is the probability that the results measured resulted from an error/pure chance.
It is important to note that not all research can infer causation relationships between two variables. The difference between correlation and causation psychology is that causation research allows the researcher to identify that a change in a variable causes a change in another variable.
Correlational research only allows the researcher to identify if there is a relationship between two variables.
The difference between correlation and causation psychology is that the researcher cannot establish if the results are due to chance or confounding/extraneous variables in correlational research, as external influences can't be controlled.
Remember, correlational research is non-experimental and so external influences can't be controlled.
There are research and theory examples of causation in psychology. These have been carried out/postulated to identify if cause-and-effect relationships can explain the phenomena.
Experimental research is a research example of causation in psychology. In this type of research, the aim is to test causation relationships between variables scientifically..
The scientific process involves:
It is because they may contribute to explaining the effects of the dependent variable and reduce the validity of the results.
The independent variable is manipulated to see if changes in this affect the dependent variable. Therefore causation in experimental research hypothesises that:
Some examples of statements that measure causation are that non-sleep-deprived students will perform better than sleep-deprived participants or that anger-related issues will reduce after undergoing anger management sessions.
An example of causation in psychology is the social causation theory.
The social causation theory in psychology proposes that mental health/disease results from social conditions or social interactions.
An example of the social causation theory is not having enough money to pay bills can be a reason for a mental breakdown.
The social causation theory has been applied to psychology and has found that people from lower socioeconomic classes are more likely to develop psychiatric disorders. This is an example of a causation theory as it explains and describes:
Let's discuss the strengths and weaknesses of causation in psychology research.
The strengths of investigating causation relationships in psychology are:
The weaknesses of investigating causation relationships in psychology are:
For instance, the social causation theory in psychology describes lower socioeconomic class individuals at higher risk of developing psychiatric illnesses, but what aspect of socioeconomic class causes this connection?
Does living conditions, poor income status, or both explain the risk best?
The social causation theory psychology is an example of a causation theory. This theory explains and describes:
The difference between correlation and causation psychology is that cause-and-effect relationships are not established in correlational research.
Causation in psychology definition is the understanding of a phenomenon in terms of cause and effect.
The four rules of causation psychology are associations, nonspuriousness, time order and chance.
Experimental research can be used to determine causation in psychology. In this research method, the independent variable is manipulated to see if changes in this affect the dependent variable. Therefore causation in experimental research hypothesises that:
How would you like to learn this content?
94% of StudySmarter users achieve better grades.
Sign up for free!94% of StudySmarter users achieve better grades.
Sign up for free!How would you like to learn this content?
Free psychology cheat sheet!
Everything you need to know on . A perfect summary so you can easily remember everything.
Be perfectly prepared on time with an individual plan.
Test your knowledge with gamified quizzes.
Create and find flashcards in record time.
Create beautiful notes faster than ever before.
Have all your study materials in one place.
Upload unlimited documents and save them online.
Identify your study strength and weaknesses.
Set individual study goals and earn points reaching them.
Stop procrastinating with our study reminders.
Earn points, unlock badges and level up while studying.
Create flashcards in notes completely automatically.
Create the most beautiful study materials using our templates.
Sign up to highlight and take notes. It’s 100% free.