Select your language

Suggested languages for you:
Log In Start studying!
Answers without the blur. Just sign up for free and you're in → Illustration


Horngren'S Financial And Managerial Accounting
Found in: Page 1322

Short Answer

Drew Castello, general manager of Sunflower Manufacturing, was frustrated. He wanted the budgeted results, and his staff was not getting them to him fast enough. Drew decided to pay a visit to the accounting office, where Jeff Hollingsworth was supposed to be working on the reports. Jeff had recently been hired to update the accounting system and speed up the reporting process.

“What’s taking so long?” Drew asked. “When am I going to get the variance reports?” Jeff sighed and attempted to explain the problem. “Some of the variances appear to be way off. We either have a serious problem in production, or there is an error in the spreadsheet. I want to recheck the spreadsheet before I distribute the report.” Drew pulled up a chair, and the two men went through the spreadsheet together. The formulas in the spreadsheet were correct and showed a large unfavorable direct labor efficiency variance. It was time for Drew and Jeff to do some investigating.

After looking at the time records, Jeff pointed out that it was unusual that every employee in the production area recorded exactly eight hours each day in direct labor. Did they not take breaks? Was no one ever five minutes late getting back from lunch? What about clean­up time between jobs or at the end of the day?

Drew began to observe the production laborers and noticed several disturbing items. One employee was routinely late for work, but his time card always showed him clocked in on time. Another employee took 10­ to 15­minute breaks every hour, averaging about 1 hours each day, but still reported eight hours of direct labor each day. Yet another employee often took an extra 30 minutes for lunch, but his time card showed him clocked in on time. No one in the production area ever reported any “down time” when they were not working on a specific job, even though they all took breaks and completed other tasks such as doing clean­up and attending department meetings.


1. How might the observed behaviors cause an unfavorable direct labor efficiency variance?

2. How might an employee’s time card show the employee on the job and working when the team member was not present?

3. Why would the employees’ activities be considered fraudulent?

1. The employees are filing timesheets for that time when they are not present in the organization. It led to unfavorable direct labor efficiency variance.

2. The timesheet of the absenteesisfilled bythe employees present at work.

3. The activities carried out by the employees are intentional. Therefore, they will be considered fraudulent activities.

See the step by step solution

Step by Step Solution

Step 1: Definition of Fraudulent Activities

The intentional action is taken to take undue advantages by using false facts, and illegal means are known as fraudulent activities.

Step 2: Cause for unfavorable direct labor efficiency variance

It is observed that the employees are filling 8 hours of working even when they are not doing so. One of them is coming late to work, one is taking a break every hour, and one employee is taking extra 30 minutes for lunch. These factors are not reported in the timesheet, leading to higher payments made to the labor than their actual payment. All these causes lead to unfavorable direct labor efficiency variance.

Step 3: Information of employee, not present

The information about the employee not working is still reflected on the employee’s timecard because the time card must be filled by any other employee who is present and working in the same department. The employees might be filling out a timecard for each other. For example: If A is absent, B is filling the information, and when B is absent, A is filling the information.

Step 4: Employee’s activities as fraudulent activities

The employee’s activities are considered fraudulent because they are taking undue advantage. They are filling timesheets for each other when some among them are absent. These activities led extra burden on the company as they have to pay their employees even when they are not working. It is fraudulent because it intends to get higher pay than its actual payment.

Most popular questions for Business-studies Textbooks


Want to see more solutions like these?

Sign up for free to discover our expert answers
Get Started - It’s free

Recommended explanations on Business-studies Textbooks

94% of StudySmarter users get better grades.

Sign up for free
94% of StudySmarter users get better grades.