• :00Days
  • :00Hours
  • :00Mins
  • 00Seconds
A new era for learning is coming soonSign up for free
Log In Start studying!

Select your language

Suggested languages for you:
Answers without the blur. Sign up and see all textbooks for free! Illustration

Q.11

Expert-verified
The Practice of Statistics for AP
Found in: Page 622
The Practice of Statistics for AP

The Practice of Statistics for AP

Book edition 4th
Author(s) David Moore,Daren Starnes,Dan Yates
Pages 809 pages
ISBN 9781319113339

Answers without the blur.

Just sign up for free and you're in.

Illustration

Short Answer

Who uses instant messaging? Do younger people use online instant messaging (IM) more often than older people? A random sample of IM users found that 73 of the 158 people in the sample aged 18 to 27 said they used IM more often than email. In the 28 to 39 age group, 26 of 143 people used IM more often than email.9 Construct and interpret a 90% confidence interval for the difference between the proportions of IM users in these age groups who use IM more often than email.

From the given information, it could be interpreted that there is 90% the probability that the difference in the proportion of IM users lies between 0.1959 and 0.3641

See the step by step solution

Step by Step Solution

Step 1: Given Information

It is given in the question that, x1=73,n1=158,x2=26,n2=143

Step 2: Explanation

The formula to compute the confidence interval for the difference in population proportion is :

CI=(p^1p^2)±zα/2×p^1(1p^1)n1+p^2(1p^2)n2

The 95% confidence interval using Ti-83 plus calculator is computed as:

Therefore, the confidence interval is (0.1959,0.3641)

Step 3: Final Answer

Therefore, it could be interpreted that there is 90% probability that the difference in the proportion of IM users lies between 0.1959 and 0.3641

Most popular questions for Math Textbooks

A driving school wants to find out which of its two instructors is more effective at preparing students to pass the state’s driver’s license exam. An incoming class of 100 students is randomly assigned to two groups, each of size 50. One group is taught by Instructor A; the other is taught by Instructor B. At the end of the course, 30 of Instructor A’s students and 22 of Instructor B’s students pass the state exam. Do these results give convincing evidence that Instructor A is more effective?

Min Jae carried out the significance test shown below to answer this question. Unfortunately, he made some mistakes along the way. Identify as many mistakes as you can, and tell how to correct each one.

State: I want to perform a test of

H0:p1-p2=0

Ha:p1-p2>0

where p1= the proportion of Instructor A's students that passed the state exam and p2= the proportion of Instructor B's students that passed the state exam. Since no significance level was stated, I'll use σ=0.05

Plan: If conditions are met, I’ll do a two-sample z test for comparing two proportions.

Random The data came from two random samples of 50 students.

- Normal The counts of successes and failures in the two groups -30,20,22, and 28 - are all at least 10.

- Independent There are at least 1000 students who take this driving school's class.

Do: From the data, p^1=2050=0.40 and p^2=3050=0.60. So the pooled proportion of successes is

p^C=22+3050+50=0.52

- Test statistic

localid="1650450621864" z=(0.40-0.60)-00.52(0.48)100+0.52(0.48)100 =-2.83

- p-value From Table A, localid="1650450641188" P(z-2.83)=1-0.0023 =0.9977.

Conclude: The p-value, 0.9977, is greater than α=0.05, so we fail to reject the null hypothesis. There is no convincing evidence that Instructor A's pass rate is higher than Instructor B's.

Icon

Want to see more solutions like these?

Sign up for free to discover our expert answers
Get Started - It’s free

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

94% of StudySmarter users get better grades.

Sign up for free
94% of StudySmarter users get better grades.